Site icon Nexreg

Oct. 2 US/EU: The EU, US approaches to endocrine disruptors have been appropriate until now

This article is brought to you by EurActiv.

 

 

When it comes to food safety, the European Union and the United States have some of the most effective scientific and regulatory programs in the world. So it came as a surprise when France flouted the studies and assurances of EU and US food safety regulators and sought to ban the use of Bisphenol A (BPA) in any food contact item starting in 2015. 

 

The possibility that anti-chemical activists could succeed in removing such a well-tested and important chemical from the marketplace has some scientists uncharacteristically outspoken.

 

They concluded that: “Regulations that profoundly affect human activities, that legally impose significant fines and even detention, should not be based on irrelevant tests forced to be regarded as relevant by administrative dictates, and on arbitrary default assumptions of no thresholds. Such standards would be contrary not only to science, but to the very principles of an enlightened governance and social contract. Not only scientists but society itself would pay dearly if unscientific approaches were to undermine our everyday practice of science, and the stringency of data analysis and evaluation developed by scientific thinking over the past centuries.

 

 

For the full article and more information please refer to the EurActiv link above.

 

Those who are interested in chemical product compliance for the EU and US should contact Nexreg, and ask about their REACH consulting service, US & EU SDS authoring, and label compliance services. Chemical data can change rapidly; Nexreg is constantly monitoring these changes to support their clients regulatory needs.

 

 

Exit mobile version